The AI Experimentby Xelec

Research lab

A lab with a delivery obligation.

Every thread here opened because a client system was not good enough. Findings land in a product within a quarter or two.

How the lab works

Three rules that keep research honest.

Problems come from production

A thread opens when a real deployment hits a ceiling: quality, latency, thermal envelope, reliability.

Findings must be reproducible

If a delivery engineer cannot apply it within a sprint, it is not finished research.

Negative results are kept

The approaches that did not work are a small lab's most valuable asset, and we tell clients about them.

Active threads

What we are working on right now.

R-01

Retrieval that holds at corpus scale

Most quality loss happens at ingestion, not inference. Chunking, hybrid scoring and freshness decay.

Active

R-02

Distillation for constrained hardware

Task-specific capability compressed into the power and thermal envelope of a board we can build.

Active

R-03

Document structure understanding

Reading order, nested tables, stamps and handwriting — a page as spatial structure, not a token stream.

Active

R-04

Agent reliability under real tools

How multi-step agents fail when tools are slow or wrong, and which supervision patterns recover.

Active

R-05

Evaluation as a first-class artifact

The eval set as the deliverable clients keep: cheap, honest, adversarial suites that catch regressions.

Ongoing

Research summaries are illustrative descriptions of internal work; experiment notes are shared under NDA.

Hardware co-design

The lab has a machine shop behind it.

Distillation targets are chosen against a board Xelec can manufacture, and validated on the bench.

5
Active research threads
< 1 qtr
Typical finding to product
60k
Frames in a distillation set
2
Reference boards in validation

Next step

Have a problem that needs research, not integration?

If your use case sits beyond what off-the-shelf models do, that is the work the lab exists for.